Friday, July 17, 2009

[bangla-vision] Legal immunity set for swine flu vaccine makers 17 Jul 2009

 

Breaking News and Commentary from Citizens For Legitimate Government
17 July 2009  
All items are here:

Walter Cronkite Dies: America's Iconic TV News Anchor Shaped the Medium and the Nation 18 Jul 2009 Walter Cronkite, America's preeminent television journalist of the 1960s and 1970s who as anchor and managing editor of "CBS Evening News" played a primary role in establishing television as the dominant national news medium of that era, died last night at age 92. Cronkite's career reflected the arc of journalism in the mid-20th century.

Barack Opharma issues ultimate bad news during Administration's 'Friday Night Bad News Dump': Legal immunity set for swine flu vaccine makers 17 Jul 2009 The last time the government embarked on a major vaccine campaign against a new swine flu, thousands filed claims contending they suffered side effects [paralysis, death] from the shots. This time, the government has already taken steps to head that off. Vaccine makers and federal officials will be immune from lawsuits that result from any new swine flu vaccine, under a document signed by Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, government health officials said Friday. The document signed by Sebelius last month grants immunity to those making a swine flu vaccine, under the provisions of a 2006 law for public health emergencies. [See: CLG Pandemic Action Alerts 12 Jul 2009 Petition against mandatory vaccines; contact the White House, US Congress --More flu news here.]

Safety questions over swine flu jab --Vaccine will be rushed out before results of health checks are known as licensing is accelerated for 132m doses of vaccine 18 Jul 2009 The first doses of swine flu vaccine will be given to the public before full data on its safety and effectiveness become available, doctors confirmed yesterday. The pandemic vaccine version will be spread over two doses in a higher quantity, and one brand [Gee, I wonder who that could be?] is expected to contain a chemical additive to make it go further, potentially increasing the risk of side-effects... A previous vaccine against swine flu turned out to be worse than the disease. An outbreak in the US in 1976 infected 200 soldiers at a military camp [Fort Dix] in New Jersey... But before it was over 40 million people had been vaccinated, 25 of whom died and 500 of whom developed Guillain-Barre syndrome, an inflammation of the nervous system which can cause paralysis and be fatal.

Baxter: The 'Lucky Larry' of swine flu Baxter Vaccine 'Oddities' By Lori Price 17 Jul 2009 Baxter files swine flu vaccine patent year ahead of outbreak --Baxter can take no more H1N1 flu vaccine orders --Baxter 2Q Profit Up 7.9%; Full-Year Guidance Raised --Baxter working on vaccine to stop swine flu, though admitted sending live pandemic flu viruses to subcontractor

Quarantine at detention center due to swine flu --ICE: 72 detainees segregated from center's general population for observation 15 Jul 2009 Authorities say dozens of immigrants being held at San Diego's Otay Mesa detention center are being quarantined because of fears over the swine flu. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials say two cases of the H1N1 virus have been confirmed at the facility since last month. The individuals were treated and recovered.

Minister defends MI5 as torture investigation looms --The police investigation into MI5 torture allegations could jeopardise Britain's national security, the Home Secretary has warned. 18 Jul 2009 In an interview with the Telegraph he vows to "defend" the agents of the Security Service and said he had "nothing but admiration for them". The Home Secretary's public endorsement of MI5 and its staff follows the decision by the Metropolitan Police to accept a request from the Attorney General for the first ever criminal inquiry into the domestic security service. Binyam Mohamed, the former Guantanamo detainee, claims MI5 knew he was tortured into 'confessing' his terrorist activities while in American custody.

Due to the UK torture investigation, false flags may serve as a weapon of mass distraction: Shopping centres on alert for terrorism attack --The security services are preparing shopping centres across the country for a successful terrorist attack that would probably result in the deaths of dozens of innocent people. 18 Jul 2009 The National Counter Terrorism Security Office now holds training days for shopping centres and other vulnerable targets up and down the country, warning: "Terrorist attacks in the UK are a real and serious danger. Crowded places, including shopping centres, are likely to feature in the attack plans of terrorist organisations..." MI5 have also launched Operation Lightening to record, research and investigate suspicious activity and it is particularly focused on the "hostile reconnaissance" of targets.

Justice agrees to exclude detainee's confession 15 Jul 2009 The Justice Department agreed Wednesday not to use a Guantanamo Bay detainee's confession that he threw a grenade at U.S. soldiers to justify keeping him imprisoned, after his attorneys argued his statements were the result of torture. The American Civil Liberties Union had asked a federal judge to exclude as evidence all statements Mohammed Jawad made during at least 57 interrogations since his capture in Afghanistan in December 2002. The ACLU, which is handling Jawad's case, said the statements should not be considered because Jawad, who was a teenager at the time of his capture, "has been subjected to repeated torture and other mistreatment" by Afghan and U.S. authorities.

House Will Investigate CIA's Handling of Canceled Program 17 Jul 2009 The House intelligence committee decided today to launch an investigation into allegations that the CIA broke the law by not informing Congress about a program launched in late 2001 to capture or assassinate 'al-Qaeda' leadership. "The committee must be kept fully and currently informed of significant intelligence activities as required by law," Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-Tex.), chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a statement.

Al-Jazeera journalist imprisoned in Guantánamo Bay to sue George Bush --Sami al-Haj -- freed in May 2008 after more than six years -- to launch legal action against former US president 17 Jul 2009 An al-Jazeera journalist who was imprisoned in Guantánamo Bay plans to launch a joint legal action with other detainees against former US president [sic] George Bush and other administration officials, for the illegal detention and torture he and others suffered at the hands of US authorities. The case will be initiated by the Guantánamo Justice Centre, a new organisation open to former prisoners at the US base, which will set up its international headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, later this month. "The purpose of our organisation is to open a case against the Bush administration," said co-founder Sami al-Haj, an al-Jazeera reporter from Sudan who was illegally detained by US authorities for over six years after being captured while he was working as a cameraman. He was freed in May 2008.

Oklahoma veterans file lawsuit against Halliburton, KBR --Veterans seek redress for those poisoned by companies 17 Jul 2009 Two Oklahoma veterans of the war in Iraq have filed a federal lawsuit claiming that Halliburton Co. and KBR Inc. have "callously exposed and continue to expose soldiers and others to toxic smoke, ash and fumes" in Iraq and Afghanistan. David Green, of Miami, Okla., and Nick Daniel Heisler of Lawton say in the complaint filed in Tulsa that they are seeking "redress for American soldiers and others deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan who were poisoned" by the companies.

Two children killed in Iraq bombing 17 Jul 2009 Two children of a senior Iraqi police officer were killed on Friday by a bomb planted in their family's garage in a town near Fallujah, west of Baghdad, a police officer told AFP. Six others, including two women and two girls aged less than 10, were wounded as the 10 and 11-year-old boys died in the sticky bomb attack, which occurred at around 3:00 am in Al-Karma, around 15 kilometres (10 miles) east of Fallujah.

3 U.S. Soldiers Killed in Southern Iraq 18 Jul 2009 Three American soldiers were killed after 'insurgents' fired mortar rounds into a United States military base in southern Iraq, an area of the country that has been largely free of the violence that continues to plague the northern part of the country. The attack occurred Thursday evening, but the American military did not report it until Friday.

Secret US-Israeli meeting to focus on Iran 17 Jul 2009 Amid reports that Israel is preparing to bomb Iranian nuclear sites, political heavyweights in Washington and Tel Aviv make plans for a secret get-together. Ria Novosti reported on Friday that US Defense Secretary Robert Gates is planning to visit Tel Aviv within the next two weeks to discuss a whole range of international issues, including Tehran's nuclear case, in secret meetings with the Netanyahu government.

Iran: Israel plotted to assassinate Ahmadinejad 17 Jul 2009 Israel conspired with Iranian opposition figures in a plot to assassinate President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during last month's election campaign, Iran's intelligence minister said on Friday. According to AFP, Intelligence Minister Gholam Hossein Mohseni Ejeie told state media in Iran that Israeli officials had met members of the People's Mujahedeen of Iran, an exiled opposition group, twice to plan Ahmadinejad's assassination.

Armed Forces chiefs call for more troops and helicopters in Afghanistan 17 Jul 2009 General Sir Richard Dannatt, the head of the Army and Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of the Defence Staff, have called for more troops and helicopters in Afghanistan. Sir Jock said his forces needed as many helicopters as they could get and were "busting a gut" to draft more into service.

Afghanistan: 'We are fighting ghost soldiers' --Will the US surge in Afghanistan help the British army get the resources it has been hoping for? 17 Jul 2008 History might record that the summer of 2009 was the pivotal moment for the British mission in Helmand. It has been a bloody few weeks with 15 dead in a 10-day period, including the most senior Army officer in three decades. These deaths, and another yesterday, and the eight coffins, has after three years of evasion, produced the necessary debate about what we are trying to achieve in Afghanistan.

Fijian working in British army killed in Afghanistan 18 Jul 2009 A Fijian working for the British army was killed in an explosion in Afghanistan on Friday. He was named as Rifleman Aminiasi Toge of 2nd Battalion The Rifles. Toge died from the blast while on foot patrol near Gereshk in the southern Helmand province on Thursday afternoon, the Ministry of Defence said.

US drone attack, clashes kill 10 in Pakistan 17 Jul 2009 A suspected US missile strike killed at least six people in northwest Pakistan while two soldiers and an equal number of Taliban rebels died in ongoing fighting in the region, officials said on Friday. A pilotless US drone aircraft fired two Hellfire guided missiles on two residential compounds used by the Taliban in Gariwam village in the tribal district of North Waziristan, which borders Afghanistan.

CIA Caught 'Off-Guard' By Jakarta Hotel Terror Attack --U.S., Indonesia Officials Fooled By al Qaeda Group 'Playing Dead' 17 Jul 2009 U.S. intelligence officials were caught "off-guard" by the Friday terror attacks against two U.S.-based hotels in Jakarta, Indonesia. A senior U.S. official told ABC News the attacks came as a "surprise." A second U.S. counter-terrorism official said the CIA and other intelligence agencies had given no indication to the White House of "any threat reporting in the last 18 months" involving the Indonesian 'al Qaeda' affiliate, Jemaah Islamiyah.

Judge Denies Bid By Airlines to Question FBI In 9/11 Case 16 Jul 2009 A U.S. judge has denied a motion by a group of airlines to depose several Federal Bureau of Investigation agents regarding the government's probes into the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. In an order Thursday, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein in Manhattan denied a motion by the airlines to question six current and former FBI agents, a potential setback for their defense. The judge indicated the airline defendants hoped to show at trial that the government's failure to apprehend the terrorists and stop the attacks was so considerable that it mitigates and excuses any alleged faults of the airlines and the terrorists likely would have succeeded even if the defendants had exercised due care.

3 Senate Republicans Endorse Sotomayor 18 Jul 2009 Three Senate Republicans yesterday endorsed Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court, giving increased momentum to securing President Obama's choice a place on the high court by early August. Sen. Mel Martinez (Fla.), former chairman of the Republican National Committee, joined veteran Sens. Richard G. Lugar (Ind.) and Olympia J. Snowe (Maine) in support of the first Hispanic nominated to the Supreme Court.

Conservative group offers endorsement for $2M By Mike Allen 17 Jul 2009 The American Conservative Union asked FedEx for a check for $2 million to $3 million in return for the group's endorsement in a bitter legislative dispute, then the group's president flipped and sided with UPS after FedEx refused to pay. For the $2 million plus, ACU offered a range of services that included: "Producing op-eds and articles written by ACU's Chairman David Keene and/or other members of the ACU's board of directors. (Note that Mr. Keene writes a weekly column that appears in The Hill.)"

AP: 'Frugal' SC gov flew in style 17 Jul 2009 South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford shed his fiscal conservatism on several taxpayer-funded international trips, including a South American jaunt that included time with his mistress, choosing expensive first-class or business-class seats while his aides sat in coach. Sanford, who once criticized other state officials for costly travel, charged the state more than $37,600 for one first-class and four business-class flights overseas since November 2005, expense records show. Other state employees flew in the back of the plane at a fraction of the price, according to the documents.

Wife of ex-GOP Rep. Pickering claims he had affair 16 Jul 2009 The estranged wife of former U.S. Rep. Chip Pickering claims in a lawsuit that the Mississippi Republican had an affair that ruined their marriage and derailed his political career. Leisha Pickering seeks unspecified damages in the alienation of affection lawsuit she filed this week against Elizabeth Creekmore Byrd of Jackson. The Pickerings filed for divorce in June 2008, but the divorce is not complete. The lawsuit says Chip Pickering and Creekmore Byrd dated in college, reconnected and began having an affair while Pickering was in Congress and living in a Christian building for lawmakers on C Street [aka GOP wh*rehouse], near the U.S. Capitol.

Georgia, South Dakota banks bring failures to 55 in '09 --Peach State sees tenth failure of 2009, South Dakota sees first since 1992 17 Jul 2009 Winder, Ga.-based First Piedmont Bank and Sioux Falls, S.D.-based BankFirst were closed by regulators Friday, bringing the number of U.S. bank failures in 2009 to 55 as the credit crisis continues to claim victims. First Piedmont Bank the 10th to fail in Georgia this year. BankFirst is the first South Dakota-based bank to fail since 1992, according to the FDIC.

Lawmakers Blast Paulson For His Response to Crisis 17 Jul 2009 Former Treasury secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. yesterday was lectured, insulted, blamed and excoriated by House Democrats and Republicans still angry about the Bush regime's handling of the financial crisis. Months of pent-up frustrations boiled over as lawmakers called on Paulson to account for a litany of perceived offenses: misleading Congress to gain approval of the $700 billion rescue program, investing in banks on overly generous terms, failing to help homeowners facing foreclosure and allowing the nation to fall into economic crisis. "You ought to come visit Ohio and see the results of your handiwork," Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D) told Paulson at the end of a particularly hot exchange, referring to the large number of her constituents who face foreclosure and eviction.

City suspends payment of contracts 17 Jul 2009 Running out of cash because of the state budget deadlock, the City of Philadelphia has stopped paying many of its bills until the impasse is resolved, City Finance Director Rob Dubow said this morning. The city must temporarily withhold about $120 million in July and August to avoid running out of cash completely, Dubow said. Payments to contractors stopped Wednesday.

CLG needs your support.
http://www.legitgov.org/donate.html
Or, please mail a check or money order to CLG:
Citizens for Legitimate Government (CLG)
P.O. Box 1142
Bristol, CT 06011-1142
Contributions to CLG are not tax deductible

Previous lead stories: Human trial of swine flu vaccine 'soon' 15 Jul 2009 The federal government has defended its policy of not following the United Kingdom's lead and rushing out a swine flu vaccine. Biopharmaceutical company CSL will start clinical vaccine trials on 240 healthy adults in Adelaide next week. The vaccine is due to be rolled out in October.

W.H.O. Says It Plans to Stop Tracking Swine Flu Cases --W.H.O.: Countries should watch for clusters of fatalities, which could indicate virus had mutated to more lethal form 17 Jul 2009 In a move that caught many public health experts by surprise, the World Health Organization quietly announced Thursday that it would stop tracking swine flu cases and deaths around the world. The announcement, made in a "briefing note" posted on the organization's Web site late in the day, perplexed some experts, and even baffled a W.H.O. spokesman, Gregory Hartl, who said in an e-mail message, "I don't have reliable info" about what his agency would track instead.

CIA Supervisor Claimed He Used Fire Ants On Detainee By Aram Roston 16 Jul 2009 A recently released legal memo describing interrogation techniques showed that Bush Administration lawyers had approved the use of "insects" in interrogations. "You would like to place [Abu] Zubaydeh in a cramped confinement box with an insect," Jay Bybee, then a Justice Department lawyer and now a federal judge, wrote in 2002... A CIA supervisor involved in the "enhanced interrogation" program bragged to other CIA employees about using fire ants while during questioning of a top terror suspect, according to several sources formerly with the Agency. The official claimed to other Agency employees, the sources say, to have put the stinging ants on a detainee's head to help break him. The CIA insists, however, that no matter what the man said, it never took place.

Those who wish to be added to the list can go here: http://www.legitgov.org/#subscribe_clg and add your name. Those who wish to unsubscribe can go here: http://lists.people-link.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legitgov. If your email provider has marked this newsletter as spam, please mark it as 'not spam' and do not delete from a spam or 'junk' folder, as such actions trigger false spam complaints against the CLG. If you have any inquiries/issues with your subscription, please write: signup at legitgov dot org.

CLG Managing Editor: Lori Price. Copyright © 2009, Citizens For Legitimate Government ® All rights reserved.


__._,_.___
Related links :
www.afterdowningstreet.org/bangladesh ;
www.mytown.ca/banglavision &
groups.msn.com/banglavision

              
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[bangla-vision] Fw: COULD THE MOON LANDINGS HAVE BEEN FAKED? [2 Attachments]

 
[Attachment(s) from Elizabeth Allen included below]

here is another one. I never saw this stuff before...you decide.

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Denver Media Service <ron@denvermediaservice.com>
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 9:34:10 PM
Subject: COULD THE MOON LANDINGS HAVE BEEN FAKED?

Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 19:33
Subject: Re: [bushcon4] *? 2 ALL: COULD THE MOON LANDINGS HAVE BEEN FAKED?*

Anyone who believes man went to the moon should watch this movie, "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon." Hard core NASA video proof it was staged. You won't be the same person after watching all of this documentary. It's worth mentioning that after Bart Sibrel made this documentary, Sibrel, with  camera crew, literally confronted each of the Apollo 11 astronauts (and some other Apollo moon mission astronauts) simply asking them to place their hand on the Bible and swear to God they went to the moon. You have GOT TO SEE what happened next! Buzz Aldrin punched Sibrel in the jaw, after running from Sibrel. Neil Armstrong literally kicked Sibrel and called him a motherfucker and other names. Michael Collins sprinted and sprinted from Sibrel. Gene Cernan admitted to Sibrel he was right...but, "So what?"
 
Here's THAT video:
Astronauts Gone Wild
 
 
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon
Part 1 of 5
 
I highly recommend watching all five parts. Actual NASA footage of Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins faking part of the Apollo 11 mission. No studio stuff......the real deal. The Apollo 11 astronauts never left Earth orbit. This documentary contends NO MAN has ever gone beyond the Van Allen Radiation Belt. Even back then the Soviet Union said the Apollo 11 mission was faked. They should know: they sent the first unmanned craft to the moon BEFORE Apollo 11. They were the first to send men into the Van Allen Radiation Belts, only to die in the process.
 
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon
Part 2 of 5
 
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon
Part 3 of 5
 
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon
Part 4 of 5
 
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon
Part 5 of 5
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 17:52
Subject: [bushcon4] *? 2 ALL: COULD THE MOON LANDINGS HAVE BEEN FAKED?*

 

 


http://www.thetoque.com/010717/pics/nasa.jpg

According to a survey in the British magazine Engineering &

Technology said 25% of respondents do not believe humans

landed on the moon. Web sites and blogs circulate suspicions 

that the moonlandings were a hoax.

=======

Hi Team!

*? 2 ALL:

COULD THE MOON LANDINGS HAVE BEEN FAKED?*

http://files.coloribus.com/files/paedia/print/part_5/56582/preview_600_404.jpg
 
(above): NASA has announced that a Hollywood film restoration company took television
video copies of the Apollo 11 footage from 40 years ago and "refurbished" it.

Could the moon landings have been faked? Why or why not?

Greg Dempsey
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ SECULARHUMANIST
Voice of the People

 

 


__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from Elizabeth Allen

2 of 2 Photo(s)

Related links :
www.afterdowningstreet.org/bangladesh ;
www.mytown.ca/banglavision &
groups.msn.com/banglavision

              
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Y! Messenger

All together now

Host a free online

conference on IM.

Yahoo! Groups

Mom Power

Just for moms

Join the discussion

Yahoo! Groups

Dogs Owners Group

Join Do More For Dogs

pet community

.

__,_._,___

[bangla-vision] Fw: Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysis

 

could this be true? there's a lot more of this...????

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Denver Media Service ron@denvermediaservice.comSent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:07:08 PM
Subject: Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysis

Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysis

 
Photo image expert, Dr. David Groves, concludes that the Apollo 11 photos allegedly taken on the moon were staged.

In an attempt to disprove our own additional lighting hypothesis, the authors went to Quantec Image Processing-UK which tested a number of NASA photos from Apollo 11. Founder, David Groves:
PhD - BSc (Hons) Class I/Applied Physics.
PhD in Holographic Computer Measurement.
Chartered Physicist and a Member of the Insitute of Physics.

__._,_.___
Related links :
www.afterdowningstreet.org/bangladesh ;
www.mytown.ca/banglavision &
groups.msn.com/banglavision

              
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[bangla-vision] Fw: JFP News 7/17: If They Deported President Roosevelt...

 

I find this coverage to be some of the best and most truthful....you decide for yourself.

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Just Foreign Policy <naiman@justforeignpolicy.org>
To: spktruthtopower200@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 6:54:24 PM
Subject: JFP News 7/17: If They Deported President Roosevelt...

Just Foreign Policy News
July 17, 2009


Just Foreign Policy News on the Web:

http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/266


[To receive just the Summary and a link to the web version, send a note with subject: "subscribe JFP News short summary" to naiman@justforeignpolicy.org.]

The Day They Arrested President Roosevelt
How might American history have been different, if, like President Zelaya, President Roosevelt had been deported by the military during a constitutional dispute? Maybe we wouldn't have a Social Security system, or minimum wage laws, or the National Labor Relations Act, which guarantees the right of workers to organize; maybe, like Honduras, 60% of our fellow citizens would live in poverty.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/265

LAWG, SOAWatch: Call, Write to Support Democracy in Honduras
The Latin America Working Group and School of the Americas Watch urge Americans to contact Congress in support of the resolution (HRes 630) introduced by Reps. Delahunt, McGovern and Serrano, calling for Honduran President Zelaya to be returned to office. The Capitol switchboard is 202.224.3121; or you can send an email here:
LAWG:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/625/t/8560/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1206
SOAWatch:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/727/t/3823/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27691

Support the Work of Just Foreign Policy
Your financial contributions to Just Foreign Policy help us create opportunities for Americans to advocate for a just foreign policy.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate.html

Summary:
U.S./Top News
1) The current stand-off in Honduras is raising questions about who is in charge of US foreign policy for the hemisphere, writes Mark Weisbrot in the Guardian. There appear to be some in the administration who would be content to let the coup government stall out the remaining months of Zelaya's term. Obama needs to lay down the law and make it clear that this coup will not stand. If Obama really wanted to get rid of the coup government he could freeze the bank accounts of those who seized power, and their supporters in the Honduran oligarchy, as suggested by the Los Angeles Times editorial board. This would have the advantage of not hurting poor people in Honduras. If the US does nothing, and the US-dependent coup regime escalates repression against Hondurans to remain in power, the region will hold the US responsible.

2) President Arias said negotiators for President Zelaya and the coup regime in Honduras had agreed to the formation of a unity government and an amnesty for President Zelaya and the coup leaders, the New York Times reports. But the two sides were still far apart on the reinstatement of President Zelaya, [which Costa Rica, the OAS and the US have said is essential to ending the crisis - JFP.] Patricia Rodas, Foreign Minister under the elected government, said President Zelaya was "on his way" back to Honduras, without specifying when or how he would enter.

3) Defense Secretary Gates he could send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan this year than the 68,000 previously announced, AP reports.

4) Honduran Congressman Marvin Ponce asked the US to step up sanctions on the coup regime in Honduras, Reuters reports. 'We are calling for economic sanctions because it is the only way the coup leaders will give up power,' Ponce said. Ponce called on Washington to suspend visas held by coup leaders and their families and to halt temporarily the transfer of remittances from Honduran workers living in the United States, among other measures.

5) U.S. military personnel at Guantanamo actively helped Chinese interrogators question members of China's Uighur minority, including physically restraining them so they could be photographed against their will, according to testimony presented to Congress, McClatchy reports. The Uighurs were turned over to U.S. troops in Afghanistan by bounty hunters who were paid $5,000 per captive. Eventually, the Uighurs were cleared of any connection to terrorism and ordered released.

Honduras
6) Writing in the Miami Herald, Honduran human-rights activist Bertha Oliva takes issue with Members of Congress and pundits in the U.S. who have sought to justify the coup in Honduras as legal or democratic. What was scheduled to take place on June 28 was not a vote on Zelaya's ability to continue in office, but a nonbinding survey on the possibility of holding a constitutional assembly. In a society based on Rule of Law, there are various mechanisms available for an opposition to make claims against a sitting administration. Kidnapping a president at gunpoint and spiriting him over the border is not one of them and declaring marital law is not one of them. The US must suspend all aid to and trade with Honduras until the legitimate president is restored to power. If the U.S. does not cut ties with Honduras, it is sending a clear signal of tacit support for those who took power illegally as well as the abuses of power we have seen in the week the regime has been in place.

7) The International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers' Federation denounced as 'disgusting' a letter from leading US trade associations to President Obama, calling for business as usual with Honduras following the coup, Inteletex reports. Seven trade groups, including the American Apparel & Footwear Association and the Chamber of Commerce, wrote to President Obama July 11 urging him to secure the US's economic relationship with Honduras. The textile workers' union expressed concern at efforts to claw back a wage increase ordered by President Zelaya to reflect the increased cost of food and other essentials.

Afghanistan
8) Afghan villagers and officials said at least five civilians were killed and 13 were wounded by US airstrikes Wednesday, the New York Times reports. Survivors of the US attack said they had not previously heard any fighting and that there were no Taliban in the village.

Pakistan
9) India and Pakistan agreed to increase communication to prevent terrorist attacks, the Washington Post reports. Previously, India had insisted that Pakistan take "concrete and demonstrable" action to prevent cross-border terrorism as a precondition for the resumption of peace talks. But a joint statement said that "action on terror should not be linked to the composite dialogue process." India has kept the issue of Kashmir out of the talks but agreed to let Pakistan include in the joint statement a mention about threats in its Baluchistan province, which Pakistan has blamed on India in the past.

Iran
10) If China follows through on plans announced by Iran for China to invest in Iran's refining capacity that Iran has announced, it could significantly weaken the US ability to threaten Iran by cutting off gas imports, Time Magazine reports.

Iraq
11) The prime minister of Iraq's autonomous Kurdish region said the Kurdish region and the Iraqi government are closer to war than at any time since 2003, the Washington Post reports. Had it not been for the presence of the U.S. military in northern Iraq, fighting might already have started, the Kurdish prime minister said.

Contents:
U.S./Top News
1) Who's in Charge of US Foreign Policy?
The coup in Honduras has exposed divisions between Barack Obama and his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton
Mark Weisbrot Guardian, Thursday 16 July 2009
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/jul/16/honduras-coup-obama-clinton

The current stand-off in Honduras, in which the coup government headed by Roberto Micheletti is refusing to allow the return of elected president Manuel Zelaya, is raising questions about who is in charge of US foreign policy for the hemisphere.
[...]
When the coup occurred on 28 June, the first statement that came out of the White House was a major blunder. Although the US and international press gave Obama a pass, the diplomatic community could hardly help noticing that the White House issued the only official statement in the world that didn't have a bad word to say about the coup when it happened.

This position shifted as events moved forward, and Obama himself even went so far as to say: "We believe that the coup was not legal and that President Zelaya remains the president of Honduras." But then his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, seemed to contradict him. Twice she was asked by the press whether restoring the democratic order in Honduras meant restoring the elected president, and twice she declined to answer.

There appear to be others in the administration who would be content to let the coup government stall out the remaining months of Zelaya's term. Obama needs to lay down the law and make it clear that this coup will not stand.
[...]
Of course, if Obama really wanted to get rid of the coup government he could freeze the bank accounts of those who seized power, and their supporters in the Honduran oligarchy. This was recommended on Tuesday by the Los Angeles Times editorial board. Such a move would most likely do the job. These people may have a cause, but they are probably more dedicated to their life savings. It would also have the advantage of not hurting poor people in Honduras.

If Obama has qualms about acting unilaterally, he could easily get approval for such sanctions in the Organisation of American States, which condemned the coup and called for the "immediate and unconditional" return of Zelaya. (The OAS doesn't have the authority to require binding sanctions on its members, but it could approve sanctions for those members who want to implement them.)
[...]
It turns out that two of the Honduran coup government's top advisers have close ties to the US secretary of state. One is Lanny Davis, an influential lobbyist who was a personal lawyer for President Bill Clinton and also campaigned for Hillary. G Gordon Liddy, the man who organised the infamous Watergate break-in in 1972, once said of his friend Davis: "He can defend the indefensible." Davis is doing that quite well lately, testifying for the coup government at a congressional hearing last week, and spinning the media on their behalf.

The other hired gun for the coup government that has deep Clinton ties is Bennett Ratcliff. "Every proposal that Micheletti's group presented was written or approved by [Ratcliff]," a witness told the New York Times on Sunday.
[...]
Violence and the control of information are their main weapons of the dictatorship. They will use them much more freely if Obama maintains his silence. This is not Iran, where denunciations from the US serve to discredit the opposition. This is a government that is highly dependent on the US for aid, commerce and moral support - and that the whole world has condemned.

The cynics will say it doesn't matter, that even if Zelaya returns to Honduras with the coup government still holding power, and the military responds with murder and mayhem, Washington can avoid responsibility. But given the long-standing and close ties between the US and Honduran military, Hillary Clinton's relationship with their advocates, the ugly history of the US in Central America and its long support for death squads and anti-democratic forces there and the mixed signals that have come from the Obama administration since the coup, Washington will be blamed for the mess and potential bloodshed that could result.

2) Some Terms Reached in Honduras Dispute
Ginger Thompson, New York Times, July 17, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/world/americas/17honduras.html

The chief negotiator for the political standoff in Honduras said Thursday that the two camps in the crisis had agreed to a number of compromises, including the formation of a so-called unity government and amnesty for crimes committed by both sides.

But, the negotiator warned, the two sides were still far apart on the central point of contention - the reinstatement of the ousted president - making it unlikely that they would reach a deal when talks formally resume this weekend. Indeed, tensions between the camps remain high, with the deposed president threatening to sneak back into the country and the de facto government enforcing a curfew after warning that armed groups were planning a rebellion.

The negotiator, President Óscar Arias of Costa Rica, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, said both sides had agreed to some form of unity government that would include members of all political parties and serve as a check on presidential powers. Fears that the deposed president, Manuel Zelaya, was trying to subvert the Constitution and extend his tenure were a driving force behind his ouster last month.

The two sides have also agreed to amnesty, Mr. Arias said, both for those who ousted Mr. Zelaya and for Mr. Zelaya himself, who has been threatened with arrest if he returns to Honduras.
[....]
Hundreds of Zelaya supporters blocked highways in Honduras on Thursday, as Patricia Rodas, the former foreign minister under Mr. Zelaya, said the ousted president was "on his way" back to the country, without specifying when or how he would enter, The Associated Press reported.

3) Gates: More US troops could head to Afghanistan
Lara Jakes, Associated Press, Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:27 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/16/AR2009071602644.html

Chicago - The Pentagon's chief said Thursday he could send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan this year than he'd initially expected and is considering increasing the number of soldiers in the Army.

Both issues reflect demands on increasingly stressed American forces tasked with fighting two wars.
[...]
Asked about Afghanistan by one soldier, Gates said, "I think there will not be a significant increase in troop levels in Afghanistan beyond the 68,000, at least probably through the end of the year. Maybe some increase, but not a lot."
[...]

4) OAS says to keep up pressure on Honduras
Tim Gaynor, Reuters, 7.15.09, 09:01 PM EDT
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2009/07/15/afx6660568.html

The Organization of American States said on Wednesday it would keep pressure on coup leaders that ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya last month, while supporting dialogue to end the crisis.
[...]
With the OAS urging continued sanctions and a negotiated settlement, a Honduran member of Congress who supports Zelaya's reinstatement asked the United States to step up sanctions on the interim government.

'We are calling for economic sanctions because it is the only way the coup leaders will give up power,' Marvin Ponce, of the leftist Democratic Unification Party, told Reuters.

Ponce, part of a delegation meeting with U.S. lawmakers and government officials, called on Washington to suspend visas held by coup leaders and their families and to halt temporarily the transfer of remittances from Honduran workers living in the United States, among other measures.

5) Uighur detainees: U.S. helped Chinese interrogate us
Grace Chung, McClatchy Newspapers, Fri, Jul. 17, 2009
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/72000.html

Washington - U.S. military personnel at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, actively helped Chinese interrogators question members of China's Uighur minority, including physically restraining them so they could be photographed against their will, according to testimony presented Thursday to a congressional subcommittee.

The testimony is certain to add to the controversy over how the U.S. government has handled the Uighurs, who were turned over to U.S. troops in Afghanistan by bounty hunters who were paid $5,000 per captive.

Eventually, the Uighurs were cleared of any connection to terrorism and ordered released from Guantanamo. Nine have been freed; 13 more remain at the prison as officials scour the world for a country that will take them..

Human rights advocates have accused the U.S. of helping China gather information from the Uighurs for use against their friends and families back home, where tension between the predominantly Muslim Uighurs and the dominant Han Chinese frequently breaks into public protest and violence.
[...]
Among the Uighurs' claims:

- U.S. military personnel treated them harshly in the days before Chinese officials visited the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in an effort to soften them up for interrogation.

- That harsh treatment included keeping the detainees awake, subjecting them to frigid temperatures, and keeping them isolated from one another and other prisoners. All of those techniques were approved for use on detainees by then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

- U.S. soldiers followed Chinese officials' orders to restrain detainees they said weren't cooperating. One detainee testified that an American told him the harsh treatment he'd received after his interrogation had been at the direction of the Chinese.
[...]

Honduras
6) No justification for coup
Bertha Oliva, Miami Herald, Wed, Jul. 15, 2009
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/other-views/story/1143103.html

[Oliva is director of the Honduran Committee of Family of the Disappeared Detainees (COFADEH) in Tegucigalpa.]

As a Honduran human-rights activist, it has been disturbing to hear the drumbeat of voices in the U.S. media justifying what is taking place in my country. While the Organization of American States, the United Nations and heads of state from countries across the political spectrum worldwide have condemned the coup, commentators in The New York Times, Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal have called it a "democratic" coup, while others have blamed exiled President Manuel Zelaya for it happening in the first place.

U.S. Rep. Connie Mack, R-Fl., has joined the chorus as well, introducing a resolution in support of the de facto regime in the name of "the Honduran people," just days after the coup leaders murdered peaceful citizens on the streets of Tegucigalpa.

The events that have unfolded in Honduras are a forceful and illegal overthrow of a democratically elected government. To justify this act by adding the adjective "democratic" to the coup is not only an oxymoron, but a blatant inaccuracy.

Many in the United States have declared that the proposal by President Zelaya to hold a national consultation on constitutional issues was so dangerous that he somehow brought the coup on himself. To set the record straight, what was scheduled to take place on Sunday, June 28 was not a vote on Zelaya's ability to continue in office, but a nonbinding survey on the possibility of holding a constitutional assembly.

To purposefully misconstrue this as an aggressive, "anti-democratic" act is to stretch the truth to its breaking point, in the service of a pre-determined position against the Zelaya government's policies or politics.

When our fragile democracy and millions of lives are at stake, what is truly dangerous is for influential opinion leaders in the United States to imply that certain kinds of democratically elected governments "deserve" overthrow. In a society based on Rule of Law, there are various mechanisms available for an opposition to make claims against a sitting administration. Kidnapping a president at gunpoint and spiriting him over the border is not one of them and declaring marital law is not one of them. Even the top legal military advisors to the de facto regime in Honduras admitted that their actions were - and are - illegal.
[...]
The last few days have been an uncanny repeat of atrocities that we thought were left behind in the 1980s: forced detentions, murder and violent repression of peaceful protesters, media censorship and suspension of constitutional rights. The situation has garnered swift reproach from Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and other prominent watchdog groups, but the stifling of dissent has only intensified inside the country.

President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have spoken up for democracy and human rights in condemning the actions of the coup leaders. Now the United States must put its money where its mouth is by formally recognizing what happened as a coup d'etat and suspending all aid to and trade with Honduras until the legitimate president is restored to power.

Honduras is deeply dependent on the United States, which is the market for roughly 70 percent of its exports. U.S. trade and aid are the backbone of our economy. If the U.S. does not cut ties with Honduras, it is sending a clear signal of tacit support for those who took power illegally as well as the abuses of power we have seen in the week the regime has been in place.

Actions speak louder than words. The U.S.. government is uniquely positioned to play the deciding role in whether or not Honduras is returned to democracy or plunged into dictatorship. Along with my fellow citizens, I pray that this is a moral and political responsibility that the Obama administration will not ignore.

7) US Trade Associations Accused over Honduras
Inteletex, July 16, 2009
http://www.inteletex.com/NewsDetail.asp?PubId=&NewsId=6319

US textile-business leaders have been criticised for putting their commercial interests above ethical concerns in their response to the recent military coup in Honduras.

The International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers' Federation dubbed as 'disgusting' a letter from leading US trade associations to President Obama, calling for business as usual with Honduras following the coup, which was supported by key elements of the country's business community.

Seven trade groups, including the American Apparel & Footwear Association, the Emergency Committee for American Trade, the National Council of Textile Organizations, the National Retail Federation, the Retail Industry Leaders Association, the Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel and the US Chamber of Commerce, wrote to President Obama on July 11 urging him to secure the US's economic relationship with Honduras.

Neil Kearney, general secretary of the Brussels-based ITGLWF, said: "This approach, which overlooks democracy, civil liberties and the rule of law, is an affront to democracy and a negation of American values.

"Since the coup there has been growing concern at the threat to trade-union and popular leaders, and it appears there is a list of leaders who are threatened with detention and whose personal safety is at risk. There have been reports that on Saturday evening, two leaders of the popular opposition to the coup, Roger Ivan Bados and Ramon Garcia, were murdered in two separate incidents by unidentified gunmen.

"There is also growing concern about worsening working conditions, and in particular at efforts to claw back a wage increase ordered by President Zelaya six months ago in order to reflect the increased cost of food and other essentials. In reality the increased wage barely covered 90% of basic food needs and less than a third of a living wage covering basic needs such as food, rent, transport, education, and medical care".

The letter from the seven trade association stressed the particular importance of Honduras for the US textile-and-apparel supply chain and called it the 'linchpin' to the Western Hemisphere supply chain for this sector. It added: "Honduras is the third largest market for US textile mill products (US exports were $1.4 billion in 2008), the fourth largest supplier of apparel to the US market and the largest DR-CAFTA [Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement] supplier to the United States."

Afghanistan
8) U.S. Strike Kills 5 Civilians, Afghans Say
Taimoor Shah and Carlotta Gall, New York Times, July 17, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/world/asia/17afghan.html

Kandahar - At least five Afghan civilians were killed and 13 were wounded when a United States patrol was attacked on Wednesday night and called in air support, villagers and local officials said Thursday.

The chief spokesman for United States forces, Col. Greg Julian, said that helicopters were sent to the area on Wednesday night after the patrol came under fire, but that he could not confirm any casualties.. The patrol was still engaged in fighting on Thursday afternoon, he said.

Nine wounded villagers, including two women and four children, reached a Kandahar hospital on Thursday. Several were unconscious, but others described helicopters firing into their compound at 11 p.m. as they fled the house and tried to hide in an orchard.

The United States military said it was investigating the reports of civilian casualties, and the governor of Kandahar Province sent a delegation to the village to investigate.

Two weeks ago the American commander of NATO and United States forces in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, issued new orders to try to reduce civilian casualties in an effort to win back the support of the Afghan people.

Over the past few years, NATO and United States operations have killed and wounded thousands of Afghans. This has contributed to growing opposition among Afghans to foreign forces in Afghanistan and to the government of President Hamid Karzai.
[...]
The wounded civilians in the Kandahar hospital were from a farming family in the village of Tawalla, in the remote district of Shah Wali Kot, which has long been a stronghold of Taliban forces. One of the wounded, Muhibullah, 24, who, like many Afghans, uses only one name, said he woke to the sound of shooting and helicopters and ran from the house with the rest of the family toward an adjoining orchard owned by his uncle.

"When we reached the garden, the helicopter shot at us and injured three of my brothers, one sister, my mother, father and sister-in-law, and killed Rahmania, a 4-year-old girl," he said. "I do not know the reason; we did not hear any fighting that night, and there are not any Taliban in our village," he said. "It was a very frightening night for us - we could all have been killed."

His father, Niamatullah, 46, said that when he woke he tried to stop the family from leaving the house, but they were already running. Helicopters were hovering near the house, he said, and when he rushed after his family, the helicopters reappeared and started firing. He said that he hid behind a wall and that the helicopters fired on it. The wall collapsed, injuring his head. He found seven members of his family lying wounded on the ground in the orchard, including four of his sons, his wife, his sister-in-law and her daughter.

He listed four neighbors, all farmers in their 20s and 30s, who he said were killed in the attack, besides Rahmania, his cousin's daughter. Haystacks and wood piles caught fire from the gunfire, which continued until 3 a.m., he said.

The governor of Kandahar Province, Tooryalai Wesa, said only four people were killed; he did not identify them. He said he did not know if the dead were civilians or insurgents, but he confirmed that there were children and women among the wounded. "We are very sad, and it should not have happened," he said.
[...]

Pakistan
9) India, Pakistan To Share Intelligence
Anti-Terror Effort Marks Break in Recriminations That Followed Mumbai Attacks
Rama Lakshmi, Washington Post, Friday, July 17, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/16/AR2009071601408.html

New Delhi - India and Pakistan agreed Thursday to increase communication and information-sharing in an effort to prevent terrorist attacks and said dialogue was the only way forward in the wake of violence such as November's siege in Mumbai.

The leaders of the two countries spoke for almost two hours on the sidelines of the Non-Aligned Movement summit at the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. In a statement afterward, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Pakistani Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani agreed to "share real-time, credible and actionable" intelligence information about possible terrorist plots.

The joint statement represented a break in the bitter blame game that followed the deadly Mumbai attacks. "Both leaders affirmed their resolve to fight terrorism and cooperate with each other to this end," the statement said. Until now, New Delhi had insisted that Pakistan take "concrete and demonstrable" action to prevent cross-border terrorism as a precondition for the resumption of peace talks.

However, the joint statement said that "action on terror should not be linked to the composite dialogue process and these should not be bracketed" and that "terrorism is the main threat to both countries."

During the talks, Singh reiterated his demand to "bring the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks to justice," and Gillani assured that Pakistan would do "everything in its power in this regard."
[...]
An Indian official said India has kept the vexing issue of the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir out of the talks and has narrowed the focus to the issue of terrorism. But Singh agreed to let Pakistan include in the joint statement a mention about threats in its Baluchistan province, which Pakistan has blamed on India in the past.

Iran
10) How Iran Might Beat Future Sanctions: The China Card
Vivienne Walt, Time Magazine, Thursday, Jul. 16, 2009
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1910669,00.html

Iran may have an ace in the hole as Western governments weigh sanctions in response to the often violent crackdown on opposition demonstrators. The card Tehran is likely to play? China.

On July 13 Iran's Oil Ministry announced that it had China's agreement to invest about $40 billion in refining Iranian gasoline. The deal would include financing the major new Hormoz refinery in southern Iran, which will be able to produce about 300,000 bbl. of gasoline and kerosene a day once the four-year construction project is completed. China would also overhaul Iran's aging Abadan refinery in the south so that its production could increase by 29%, according to Iranian oil officials, who provided no deadline for that project.

The deal has not yet been signed (and China has yet to confirm it), but if Iran pulls it off, it would solve one of the country's biggest headaches. For despite vast oil reserves and exports, Iran still imports about 130,000 bbl. of gasoline a day because its refineries are too few and too old to meet the demand at home. The Chinese deal would literally keep Iran's factories, homes and cars - in effect, a nation of 66 million people - running.

At the moment, Iran's gasoline imports are not affected by U.S. sanctions or the international, U.N.-agreed sanctions. But the willingness of other countries to sell gasoline to Iran has faltered as political pressure mounts over Iran's nuclear program. India, a major supplier, recently suspended exports of gas for a brief while, according to the Paris-based International Energy Agency. "If you really want to use effective sanctions, then you want to cut off gas imports," says Erica Downs, China energy fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. "If the Chinese do invest $40 billion and dramatically increase Iran's refining capacity, it would definitely weaken one of the weapons in the U.S. arsenal."
[...]
Major Western oil companies operating in Iran, including Total, Royal Dutch Shell and the Italian company ENI, have held off from signing new deals with Iranian oil officials for several months, perhaps waiting to see if President Obama's moves to open talks with Tehran will succeed in breaking the political impasse. The Chinese deal last month to develop the South Pars gas field came only after Total opted not to sign, fearing political fallout. Such fears have rarely fazed Beijing - and are unlikely to now.

Iraq
11) Kurdish Leaders Warn Of Strains With Maliki
Military Conflict a Possibility, One Says
Anthony Shadid, Washington Post, Friday, July 17, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/16/AR2009071604369.html

Irbil - Iraq's autonomous Kurdish region and the Iraqi government are closer to war than at any time since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, the Kurdish prime minister said Thursday, in a bleak measure of the tension that has risen along what U.S. officials consider the country's most combustible fault line.

In separate interviews, Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani and the region's president, Massoud Barzani, described a stalemate in attempts to resolve long-standing disputes with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's emboldened government. Had it not been for the presence of the U.S. military in northern Iraq, Nechirvan Barzani said, fighting might have started in the most volatile regions.

The conflict is one of many that still beset Iraq, even as violence subsides and the U.S. military begins a year-long withdrawal of most combat troops from the country. There remains an active sectarian conflict, exacerbated by insurgent groups that seem bent on reigniting Sunni-Shiite carnage. There is also a contest underway in Baghdad to determine the political coalition that will rule the country after next year's elections. But for months, U.S. officials have warned that the ethnic conflict pitting Kurds against Arabs, or more precisely the Kurdish regional government against Maliki's federal government in Baghdad, poses the greatest threat to Iraq's stability and could persist for years.
[...]

-
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org

Just Foreign Policy is a membership organization devoted to reforming US foreign policy so it reflects the values and interests of the majority of Americans.


------------

Click here to unsubscribe


__._,_.___
Related links :
www.afterdowningstreet.org/bangladesh ;
www.mytown.ca/banglavision &
groups.msn.com/banglavision

              
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[wvns] Obama in Africa: A Major Disappointment

 

Just because President Obama possesses African heritage doesn't mean he couldn't learn a thing or two about the continent's history.

Obama in Africa: A Major Disappointment
by Gerald Caplan
July 16, 2009
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090720/caplan

As expected, President Obama used his twenty-four-hour trip to Ghana to send messages about his thinking and his priorities for Africa. This was a moment that progressives involved in Africa have been waiting for, hoping for some clear thinking about Africa's many challenges and the American role in addressing them. On the basis of his interviews and speeches, they will be sorely disappointed. Once we get beneath the eloquence and style, it's hard to point to anything in any of his remarks that couldn't have been said, however inarticulately, by George Bush.

In one interview, Obama, with no false humility, stated that "I'm probably as knowledgeable about African history as anybody who's occupied my office". No question that's true. Still, the bar in that particular competition was not exactly set very high. And as his various comments demonstrated, he's not nearly as knowledgeable as he thinks he is. Much of what he believes about Africa and how it can meet its many challenges is simply wrong.

At every opportunity, the President emphasized internal African causes for the continent's woes, highlighting especially the need for good governance and ending corruption. So he argued, for example, that "you're not going to get investment without good governance." That's just wrong. For decades most foreign investment in Africa has gone to South Africa first, even under apartheid, and then to such oil-rich nations as Angola and Nigeria. First and foremost, western companies, backed energetically by their embassies, are after Africa's resources--oil, gas and to a lesser extent minerals. These are the very sectors where we find vast corruption, environmental degradation, the vicious exploitation of African labor, and, often enough, Africa's wars. In no case does good governance play a role in investment decisions. Often enough venal leaders are precisely what investors look for.

Similarly, Obama insisted that business won't invest where "government officials are asking for 10, 15, 25 percent off the top." That's an illogical assertion. If foreign businessmen weren't only too eager to play the bribery game, those African officials couldn't get away with demanding a cut off the top. Nigeria, Angola, South Africa, Kenya, Cameroon, Congo--everyone knows how to get a contract in these and other countries. Which also should remind us that high-level corruption in Africa could not and does not happen without intimate western collaboration.

Obama's repeated insistence on this theme of good governance and corruption is somewhere between ironic and farcical, given the eight African leaders who were invited to last week's G-8 summit. Five were from sub-Saharan Africa, three from North Africa. Every one of them is ranked poorly or abysmally in Transparency International's 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index. Seven of the eight are considered only partly free or not free by Freedom House in 2009; only one (South Africa, led by the deeply corrupt Jacob Zuma) is deemed free. It was an important if inadvertent lesson: Corruption and poor governance are indeed widespread, if not quite ubiquitous, across Africa, and the west cheerfully plays footsies with all those governments.

Obama says there is "a direct correlation between governance and prosperity." That's why he chose democratic Ghana for his first official state visit, rather than his father's country, Kenya. Heaven knows that the ruling parties in Kenya are brazenly corrupt and dedicated to little beyond enriching themselves and their supporters. Ghana, on the other hand, after years of bad governments following the CIA-backed coup that overthrew its first president, Kwame Nkrumah, can now be said to be fairly stable and democratic (though hardly free of corruption). Obama knows lots of interesting things. When his father left Kenya in the early 1960s to study in the USA, he noted, the GDP of Kenya was higher than that of South Korea; today, Korea is one of the world's great economic success stories, while Kenya languishes.

The UN's Human Development Index backs this up. In 2008, of 179 countries listed, Korea was ranked an impressive twenty-fifth while Kenya was 144. But the President should look at these ratings more closely. Despite good governance, and though some real progress is being made, Ghana was ranked 142, virtually tied with Kenya among the bottom 20 percent of the world's nations. Something else must be going on here that accounts for this depressing situation because Obama's analysis can't.

Here's the heart of his diagnosis,: While the international community "has not always been as strategic as it should have been [regarding Africa]...ultimately I'm a big believer that Africans are responsible for Africa...for many years we've made excuses about corruption or poor governance, that this was somehow the consequence of neocolonialism, or the West has been oppressive, or racist. I'm not a believer in excuses."

This is really a startling argument for the head of a country whose great political battles still rage around the meaning of its Constitution, adopted in 1787 while the slave trade still raged, and whose personal inspiration comes from a predecessor who was murdered in 1865, twenty years before formal colonialism began in Africa. To dismiss the slave trade and a century or more of colonial rule, to minimize the impact of neocolonialism by France and the US, to ignore the incalculable decades-long damage done to Africa as a pawn in the cold war--all of this seems to requite willful blindness in order to peddle a particular agenda.

Of course Obama's obsession about appalling governance is not wrong; I share it completely. Africans have for decades been betrayed by a veritable pageant of monstrous leaders, one more egregious than the other. But another truth is that the United States actively backed almost all of them, and if the US didn't, France did; that's part of the neocolonial record. The west also supplied many of the arms that were used in the appalling internal conflicts that have roiled Africa for so long. Even today, the US, Britain and France continue to remain close to many African leaders whose democratic credentials leave much to be desired, as the G-8 meeting underlined.

The President raised Zimbabwe to make his case. The West, he is not responsible for the destruction caused by Robert Mugabe and his government. The destruction is only too true. The West's innocence is not.

Had Britain fulfilled its clear obligations and ended white minority rule in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe in a timely fashion, fifteen years of vicious civil war would have been avoided. Instead, the final African victory left the country in the hands of an embittered, vengeful Mugabe. America and Britain were collaborating with the apartheid regime in South Africa at the very moment it was actively working worked to sabotage Mugabe's new government. The IMF forced structural adjustment programs on an unwilling Zimbabwean government, helping to undermine its economy. All this is well known. So is the fact that for the first twenty years of his reign, "Good old Bob" Mugabe was one of the west's favorite "Big Men", blithely ignoring his ferocious oppression of his opponents. Not until he began expropriating the vast holdings of white farmers ten years ago--all of whose land was stolen from Africans during the twentieth century (though not necessarily by the current owners)--did western media and western governments decide he was Enemy Number One. Can Obama know nothing of this record?

"Development depends on good governance," Obama lectured Ghana's Parliament. "That is the change that can unlock Africa's potential." With all due respect to the President, this is malarkey. The reality, which surely Obama grasps, is that for centuries, year in and year out, far more of Africa's wealth and resources pour out of the continent to the rich world than the west provides Africa through all sources, from aid to investment to trade. Good governance will not end this perverse truth.

Beyond that, even if every African country was led by a saint, they could do nothing about the severe environmental and economic damage that global warming--for which Africa has no responsibility whatever--is inflicting across the continent. Obama actually mentioned this in his speech, yet ignores it with his obsessive fixation on Africa's sole responsibility for its problems.

Even the most exemplary African leaders could do nothing about the destructive impact on African development of the present worldwide economic crisis, for which Africa has no responsibility whatever.

No African leader has the slightest influence on the drastic increase in food prices that is causing such suffering, including outright starvation, to millions of Africans.

Even a continent of Mandelas couldn't change the massive subsidies that western governments provide to their agribusinesses. When they're in Ghana, the Obamas should do some comparison shopping. They may be taken aback to find that it costs more to buy a locally-bred chicken than a subsidized one that's been shipped frozen all the way from Europe. To this, Obama reassured his Ghanaian hosts, "America can do more to promote trade and investment."

And nothing can be done about the enormous damage already done to Africa by the destructive neoliberal policies that were imposed on African governments by the World Bank and IMF over the past thirty years. Even today, while their rhetoric has changed, these institutions, deeply American-influenced, continue to insist on discredited policies that have failed to promote growth while vastly increasing inequality.

None of this was tackled by Obama. For him, the relationship between Africa and the rich world is a one-way street. Africans are screwing up, and if they want more American aid, they've got to get their act together. This is the Obama analysis--simplistic, myopic, patronizing, implicitly threatening, just what we expected and got from George Bush. Like Bush, evidence based-reality takes a back seat to whatever reality a president chooses to concoct.

For the past decade, it's been widely agreed that the US has three overriding interests in Africa: exploiting natural resources, above all oil and gas; fighting Islamists; and competing with China. In all cases, Africa is merely a pawn, something to be used to pursue America's interests, not Africa's. African development and everything related to it are secondary matters. Substantively, nothing Obama has committed himself to alters these priorities, especially his strong endorsement of the suspiciously vague new US military command structure for Africa, called AFRICOM. But the Americans have been unable to persuade a single African country except ever-cooperative Liberia to host the base for this structure, all fearing the increasing militarization of US-African relations. Given that they're a gang of corrupt leaders who govern poorly, this should surely send Obama a pretty clear message.

I documented the case against the Obama analysis of Africa in a book published last year, The Betrayal of Africa. It demonstrates the twin burdens that actually account for Africa's condition--their own wretched leaders combined with destructive western policies and practices. I know the President is a pretty busy guy, but it's a short book and he clearly enjoys reading and learning. Unless he learns what's really going on in Africa, his administration will become yet another in an endless line that has caused Africa more grief than good. Hard to credit, but yes it can.

*********************************************************************

WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/

Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@yahoo.com for instructions.

To leave this list, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[wvns] Padilla vs. Yoo: An Update

 

Padilla vs. Yoo: An Update
by Jacob G. Hornberger
http://freedetainees.org/6218

There are two interesting developments in Jose Padilla's lawsuit against former Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, who was one of the authors of the infamous torture memos.

First, the Justice Department is no longer defending Yoo in the case. He will now be represented by a private attorney, paid for by the Justice Department.

Second, Yoo is appealing the ruling of the federal district court denying his motion to dismiss Padilla's case.

A motion to dismiss requests the court to summarily dismiss the plaintiff's case without hearing any evidence. The motion essentially says: "Even if you accept as true everything the plaintiff is saying in his petition, he is not entitled to win as a matter of law."

Generally, courts are loath to summarily dismiss cases brought by litigants. The general rule is that everyone is entitled to the opportunity to prove his case.

Thus, in ruling on a motion to dismiss, the court will accept as true
everything that is stated in the plaintiff's petition. If such facts, if later proved, can support a legal case against the defendant, the court will deny the motion to dismiss.

Can a defendant appeal a motion to dismiss? The general rule is no because the courts frown on interlocutory appeals, that is, appeals that are taken before a case has been finally resolved. Since a denial of a motion to dismiss is not a final resolution of the case (because the case is allowed to continue forward), the general rule is that an appeal cannot be taken from it.

So, why would Yoo be taking an appeal at this stage? My hunch is that he, along with a lot of other people in the Bush administration, are panicked over the judge's ruling and are now looking for every way possible to delay the continuation of the suit.

Why? Because Padilla's lawsuit provides the means by which Yoo and other Bush administration people can be forced to testify under oath in a federal court proceeding as to exactly what went on in the so-called war on terror.

Except for Padilla's case, giving sworn testimony is something the Bush people could easily succeed in avoiding, given congressional apathy toward an official investigation and executive branch opposition to criminal prosecutions.

Why is Padilla's lawsuit important? Because the ultimate ruling in the case will apply not just to him but also to all Americans. The suit alleges that the U.S. government took Padilla into custody and held him for several years without charge, until finally indicting him and convicting him in federal district court of the federal crime of terrorism. For years prior to the indictment, Padilla was held in the custody of the U.S. military, where he was denied right to counsel, the right to due process of law, the right to bail, the right to a speedy trial, the right to a jury trial, and other procedural protections guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. He was also subjected to torture, sensory deprivation, isolation, sleep deprivation, and many other cruel and unusual pre-trial measures.

The government takes the position that it had the legitimate authority to do these things to Padilla and that it, in fact, has the legitimate authority to do them to every other American, as part of its "war on terrorism." Yoo is saying that as a government lawyer who was just delivering legal opinions, he is immune
from Padilla's suit.

The district judge disagreed. He held that the U.S. government lacks
constitutional authority to subject the American people to such treatment and that any lawyer who knowingly participates in a scheme to subject Americans to such mistreatment is not immune from suit.

Given the predilection of the courts against interlocutory appeals, in my opinion the Court of Appeals will quickly rule against Yoo's appeal, enabling Padilla to continue with his case and begin taking sworn depositions. That will be when things start to get interesting.

===

John Yoo's Defense of Himself Is as Persuasive
as Most of His Legal Opinions
By Spencer Ackerman
http://freedetainees.org/6212

This is your horrible, dystopian future: John Yoo, the former Office of Legal Counsel official who had a hand in crafting the Bush administration's detentions, interrogations and warrantless surveillance abuses, writes endless and endlessly misleading defenses of himself. Some people die because of Yoo's cavalier relationship with the law — about 100, actually — and others get law school sinecures and limitless op-ed real estate to explain away what they did. Few people write so much for so long with so little self-reflection. You'll be reading these op-eds in the nursing home. Yoo's latest comes in response to Friday's report from five inspectors general about the warrantless surveillance and data-mining escapades of the Bush administration. Welcome to your future.

Yoo starts things off with his typical flourish of disingenuousness:

Suppose an al Qaeda cell in New York, Chicago or Los Angeles was planning a second attack using small arms, conventional explosives or even biological, chemical or nuclear weapons. Our intelligence and law enforcement agencies faced a near impossible task locating them. Now suppose the National Security Agency (NSA), which collects signals intelligence, threw up a virtual net to intercept all electronic communications leaving and entering Osama bin Laden's Afghanistan headquarters. What better way of detecting follow-up attacks? And what president — of either political party — wouldn't immediately order the NSA to start, so as to find and stop the attackers?

Evidently, none of the inspectors general of the five leading national security agencies would approve.

Those inspectors general, in Yoo's imagination, aren't overworked bureaucrats in wrinkle-free shirts, cotton Dockers and overgrown haircuts, buried under endless reams of paper. They're useful idiots for Osama bin Laden. In truth, the reason why the inspectors general don't entertain that scenario is because it's absurd. If the intelligence community knew what the "electronic communications" signatures heading into and out of Osama bin Laden's Afghanistan headquarters were, they could very easily obtain warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, because they'd possess individualized suspicion. This is an unproblematic case, fitting easily under the aegis of the law on Sept. 12, 2001. It has absolutely nothing to do with what the inspectors general call the "President's Surveillance Program." That's also why the battery of Justice Department leaders like Acting Attorney General Jim Comey, Associate Attorney General Jack Goldsmith, FBI Director Robert Mueller and Associate Deputy Attorney General Patrick Philbin fought to rein in the surveillance activities — because they were overbroad and outside of FISA, which Congress explicitly made the "exclusive means" for conducting legal foreign surveillance. Yoo continues:

It is absurd to think that a law like FISA should restrict live military operations against potential attacks on the United States.
Actually, it's absurd to think that a law like FISA does. Yoo cites the 9/11 Commission, saying it found that "FISA's wall between domestic law enforcement and foreign intelligence" proved to be such a hindrance, but that's a misrepresentation. FISA has no such wall. The "wall" was an invention of the Justice Department under Janet Reno to separate foreign-collected surveillance from criminal investigations, nothing even close to "live military operations," and in practice that bureaucratic restriction went too far and inhibited necessary FBI-CIA collaboration. The Bush administration's response wasn't to get Congress to change FISA; it was to entirely circumvent it.

Clearly, the five inspectors general were responding to the media-stoked politics of recrimination, not consulting the long history of American presidents who have lived up to their duty in times of crisis. More than a year before the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt authorized the FBI to intercept any communications, domestic or international, of persons "suspected of subversive activities . . . including suspected spies."
You know what law, passed in 1978, didn't exist when FDR was president? Yoo goes even further, and takes selective quotations from Jefferson and Hamilton to suggest that his long-discredited theory that presidents have king-like powers during times of war, and yet he never comes out and says it, because even in The Wall Street Journal people can recognize absurdity.

What's amazing about Yoo's caustic attack on the inspectors general report is that the report itself embarrasses Yoo but does little else. There's no suggestion of prosecution, no recommendation of additional investigation, no harsh language. It says simply that Yoo says what he says in this op-ed and that his superiors at OLC were cut out of that loop. That's all. Yoo's not even in danger, if reports about Attorney General Eric Holder's potential new investigation are to be believed, of moving into the crosshairs of the Justice Department. Today's attack on the inspectors general is Yoo's response to having his own words quoted back at him. Which, perhaps, is insult enough. It's like seeing the next 30 years of your life unfold before your horrified eyes.

*********************************************************************

WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/

Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@yahoo.com for instructions.

To leave this list, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[wvns] David Harris of AJC won't debate Walt and Mearsheimer

 

David Harris of AJC declines to debate Walt and Mearsheimer after all
Philip Weiss
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc8ad53ef011571f4f729970b

John Mearsheimer sent me the following email lately:

There is not going to be a debate between me and David Harris [executive director of the American Jewish Committee]. As you know, he previously said that he wanted to debate me, but that I was afraid to engage him. However, it seems clear from my negotiations with one of his key deputies at the AJC that the opposite is the case: David Harris is afraid to debate me.

As you and many of your readers know, I declined to debate David
Harris on the Dom Giordano radio show out of Philadelphia on March 12,
2009. What he wanted was for both of us to appear together for a few
minutes on that show to debate the Chas Freeman affair. I did not want
to do that, mainly because it is impossible to have a meaningful debate in such circumstances, as I told the host of the radio show. I thought that was the end of the matter, but the next day the AJC put out a press release titled: "Don't Run Away From Debate, AJC'S Harris Tells Mearsheimer."

You heard about this from a friend and asked me if it was true. I responded and on March 30 you posted my explanation of what had happened. In that posting I said that Steve Walt and I would love to debate David Harris and someone else from the lobby in a public forum in New York City. I was sure there would be great interest in such an event and that there would be no problem filling a large auditorium and getting C-Span to cover it.

On April 2, I received an e-mail from Ben Cohen, the Associate
Director of Communications at the AJC, asking me to contact him "to
explore the possibility of a public debate with David Harris and a
colleague." We talked for the first time on April 3, and we agreed that we would not reveal the details of our subsequent conversations and e-mails. For that reason, I can only tell you the broad outlines of what happened in our negotiations We had three more telephone conversations, the last one at the end of June. My preference was to have a public debate in a large auditorium and to have Steve and me on one side and David Harris and someone else from the lobby on the other side. Those preferences, of course, were clearly stated in my March 30 posting. The AJC, however, preferred a debate between just me and David Harris and they wanted to do it on the radio, with the two of us in different locations.

After some discussion, we agreed to have a one-on-one debate
involving me and David Harris and to do it on radio, but with both of
us in the same studio in New York City. We had little difficulty
reaching that arrangement, and were set to work out the details when
Ben Cohen informed me in our last conversation that there had been a
change in the situation and that David Harris would be spending most of his time out of the country during the remaining six months of this
year. As a result, he would not be able to debate me after all. Ben
Cohen said we might be able to revisit the issue at the start of next
year, but I do not believe that this will happen. In short, there is
not going to be a debate between me and David Harris.

I was not surprised by what happened, nor was Steve. Indeed, I told
a number of people, you included, that I did not think there would be a debate. The reason is simple: the lobby has virtually no interest in
open and free-wheeling discussions about Israeli policy, the US-Israeli relationship, or the role of the lobby in American political life. If that were to happen, it would quickly become clear to large numbers of Americans that the so-called "special relationship" makes no sense – for either the US or Israel – and that the only reason we support Israel so generously and nearly unconditionally is because of the lobby's profound influence. Of course, we would have emphasized these points in a real debate, and David Harris would have had his hands full countering our arguments. Truth and justice are not on his side.

I am sure that if David Harris thought that he could dominate me and
Steve in a real debate, we would have had one. But he knows better and
thus he is running scared, as he should be.

*********************************************************************

WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/

Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@yahoo.com for instructions.

To leave this list, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___